The Death of an Altar Boy – Danny Croteau

An article by
1st July 2020  •  4 min read

Danny Croteau was just 13-years-old when he was bludgeoned to death. The main suspect in his murder was a local priest who befriended Danny and his brothers. Following his murder, it would be discovered that the priest had been molesting young boys, including Danny's brother...


Morbidology Podcast

The article continues below

Morbidology is a weekly true crime podcast created and hosted by Emily G. Thompson. Using investigative research combined with primary audio, Morbidology takes an in-depth look at true crime cases from all across the world.


Standing at 5 foot 6 inches and weighing 135 pounds, Danny Croteau was big for a 13-year-old. His parents, Carl and Bernice Croteau, would describe him as a daydreamer. He often spoke about wanting to go on safari and loved making his siblings laugh. He had blue eyes, dirty blond hair and freckles sprinkled over the bridge of his nose.

According to The Republican newspaper, he prayed for snow in the winter so that he could shovel the drives of his neighbours to earn a little bit of extra cash for Christmas gifts. One year, he bought his grandmother a ceramic owl because he looked at her as the wise one of the family. He loved his bike but his family said that there was nothing he loved more than fishing. As his mother fondly recalled: “The only way I can describe Danny is: he was a boy, a real boy.”

On the 14th of April, 1972, Danny came home from school, threw his backpack on the floor and rushed back outside to play kickball in a neighbour’s yard. His parents had no issues with Danny playing out on the street; this was a safe neighbourhood where everybody knew one another. However, unbeknownst to Carl and Bernice at the time, this was the last time they would ever see Danny alive.1

The following morning, Danny was found floating under the Interstate 291 bridge in the murky waters of Chicopee River. He had been bludgeoned over the head and face with a heavy object, presumably a rock. The autopsy concluded that he had died of fractures of the skull and lacerations of the brain.

The family’s former parish priest, Richard Lavigne, has long been considered a suspect in the slaying.

Danny and his brothers had all been altar boys which is how they met Lavigne. The priest was said to have immediately took to the Croteau boys. According to Carl: “He was always coming over for coffee, for dinner, to play with the kids, to take them places. He played kind of rough with the kids, but he was a physical man. I know he liked weight lifting.” Carl and Bernie were hardworking; with seven children, they had to be. They said that Lavigne often bring them roast dinners and would take the children to the local swimming pool and initially, they found his interest in the boys to be innocent.

Richard Lavigne with Joe, Danny, Michael, and Jackie Croteau.

When Lavigne was transferred to St. Mary’s in East Springfield in 1968, he stayed in contact with the family. He still came over to visit the brothers and the brothers would sometimes go to St. Mary’s Rectory to spend the night. However, just days after Danny was murdered, Lavigne called the family and said that under the circumstances, he didn’t think he should see the family any longer. “We didn’t know what he was talking about,” said Carl.

Ten days later, Carl and Bernie were informed that Lavigne was a suspect in their son’s murder. A witness claimed that on the night of the murder, she had spotted Lavigne near the crime scene but was threatened by the then-bishop and district attorney from coming forward. It was never disclosed what the woman supposedly saw but the report alleges a grave abuse of authority and raises many questions. Carl was told by former Hampden County District Attorney, Matthew Ryan Jr. that “he didn’t think he could get 12 jurors to convict a priest.”

In 2008, thousands of pages of investigative records were ordered to be released by Superior Court Associate Justice John Agostini. The records once again detailed the testimony of the earlier witness but additionally detailed that there were several other witnesses who reported seeing Lavigne on the night of the murder at the murder scene or where the body was discovered. These witnesses waited many years to come forward because they had been dissuaded by others from making statements.

 “This statement alleges a grave abuse of authority by the district attorney in 1972, and raises concerns about law enforcement authorities relationship with the Diocese and their handling of evidence incriminating Lavigne,” wrote the judge.2

There had also been statements from a friend who recalled a 1968 camping trip with Danny, Lavigne and six other boys in the wilderness of Goshen. While camping, the boys started to tease Danny and Lavigne joined in. Danny threatened Lavigne with the words: “I’ll tell! I’ll tell!” According to the statement, the threat had a drastic affect on Lavigne who immediately ordered the boys to stop teasing Danny.3

While Lavigne had been considered a suspect in the murder from the very beginning of the case, he was publicly named as a suspect in the 1990s after he was convicted of molesting two altar boys. He served just ten years of probation and then in 2004, he was removed from the priesthood by the Vatican.

Following his molestation conviction, Danny’s brother, Joseph, filed a suit against Lavigne, charging that he had molested him when he was 13-years-old. He said that the priest had fondled him and masturbated in his presence during several incidents at Lavigne’s home, a church rectory and his parents’ home. In fact, Joseph made a statement alleging the abuse back in 1972 but nothing ever came of it and it was brushed under the rug.4

At a time and a place when few would believe a priest could molest a child let alone kill a child, no charges were ever brought against Lavigne for the murder of Danny despite the fact that virtually every single investigator who worked on the case came to the conclusion that Lavigne was guilty.5 Despite their conclusions, there has apparently been not enough evidence to definitively link Lavigne with Danny’s murder.

Over the years, Danny’s parents came to accept his death but still want somebody to be held accountable. “All we truly want is the truth to come out so we can be at peace. We’ve accepted Danny’s death. We believe he is in heaven. We have to fight with the Catholic church, the diocese, our parish, St. Catherine’s, our pastor, Father (Charles) Gonet. We want Danny’s case to be resolved.”

Lavigne, who still maintains his innocence, currently lives with his mother in Chicopee.

4.7 6 votes
Article Rating

Footnotes:

  1. The Republican, 27 October, 1991 – “Parents Dream of Son, Long for Justice”
  2. Dedham Transcript, 15 January, 2008 – “New Documents in Altar Boy’s Murder”
  3. Journal Inquirer, 6 August, 2004 – “Mass. Court Releases Documents from Probe of Altar Boy’s Slaying”
  4. The Republican, 9 December, 1993 – “Lavigne Faced with Abuse Suit”
  5. Journal Inquirer, 18 January, 200 – “A Boy’s Death Revisited”

Comments:

Subscribe
Notify me of
guest
3 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
keith
keith
1 month ago

“We have to gight with the Catholic church, the diocese, our parish, St. Catherine’s, our pastor, Father (Charles) Gonet.”

Spelling mistake last paragraph

Rufus
Rufus
15 days ago

That predator Richard Lavigne should be in a cage. It’s still not too late! There is a special place in hell for perverts like that animal!

You may also like:

3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x